Loose Change

The Prelude to Loose Change is just one of the many conspiracy theories around 9/11. It is a complete travesty to go and parade on the date meant to remember and honor the victims. The last piece of it is especially a daunting example of angle of vision- “Shhh, NY’s best kept secret”- which is clearly not about 9/11 but used to create a perspective of hidden messages.
The government did know that there was something going on at the time around 9/11. They didn’t know exactly what was coming though. 9/11 did change perspective on what censorship was. The video itself states the ultimate truth of this piece: “Those that control the images will control public opinion”. It clearly shows that this is only an angle of vision. All speeches used from credited sources are only one to two sentences and thus can be taken out of context to create an image that never actually existed.
Clearly the footage has been edited to only show pieces of a speech out of context. How is the truth about an online resource more credible than an actual video of Osama Bin Laden? How is the fact that they go to strip clubs relevant to whether or not they prepare for paradise? Is it possible that they were living life to the fullest before the final end?
Personally, this video is reprehensible at best for only stating one of the views possible revolving around this event. Technically, it was foreseen over 400 years ago through the works of Nostradamus. Information can be found that can coincide with an event after the fact. The only way that it can be claimed is if it has already happened. The angle of vision in this piece is clearly set up to tear down any chance that this was all circumstantial at most. When an aircraft is ripped apart, the atmospheric pressure between the inside of the plane and the out side of the plane will directly pull anything not weighted down straight out of a plane. We don’t know for sure that the documents were in his pocket. They could have been relatively anywhere.
In conclusion, I feel this video is a complete fallacy built around circumstantial evidence that in no way can be rightly claimed as absolute truth. Speeches are taken out of context, documents are scrutinized under different levels, and paper trails are deemed planted just because of the likelihood that this could happen.